first_imgReal Good Food has raised £1m with an open share offer that it says had been heavily oversubscribed.The business announced last month that it was seeking to raise extra working capital with the offer.The move follows a troubled period for the Haydens and Renshaw owner, which earlier this year admitted there had been a “significant risk” it would not be able to trade without additional funding from its major shareholders. The business has also warned it expects to make a £3.5m earnings loss this year (see timeline below).Under the open share offer, the business issued 20,115,190 ordinary shares of £0.02 each and received applications for 29,984,154 shares – an excess of 49% of the total available.RGF said qualifying shareholders who have applied for shares will receive their application in full and those shareholders who have applied for excess shares will receive around 61% of their application on a pro rata basis.Real Good Food timeline1 August 2017RGF announces earnings for 2017 will be £2m, around £3m lower than previously forecast, and that profits in 2018 will be lower than expected.RGF also reveals that payments for consultancy services made to executive chairman Pieter Totté and non-executive director Peter Salter have not been disclosed in transaction notes for accounts in 2014 to 2016, but have been accounted for.Salter, chairman of RGF audit and remuneration committees, resigns.8 AugustFounder and executive chairman Pieter Totté resigns and steps down from the board with immediate effect.Non-exec director Pat Ridgwell becomes interim chairman, while non-exec director Christopher Thomas becomes executive director.Finance director David Newman is replaced by Harveen Rai, but remains with the company for a changeover period.New non-executive director Hugh Cawley joins the board to head RGF’s audit committee, while non-exec director Judith Mackenzie becomes head of the remuneration committee.16 AugustRGF secures a £2m overdraft facility with Lloyds Bank after a re-forecasting exercise finds a “short-term working capital requirement” as the business builds up stock ahead of Christmas and proceeds with previously announced investment programmes at Renshaw and Haydens.29 AugustRGF further reduces profit expectations for 2017 to £1m.14 SeptemberRGF says it is committed to improving its corporate governance and reporting, admitting standards have been below those investors “might reasonably expect”, adding it is “committed to rectifying this important aspect of operations and disclosure”.21 SeptemberShareholders agree to give the business a £4m short-term debt facility.OctoberRGF reports a £5.8m loss in the 12 months ending 31 March 2017, despite a £7.8m year-on-year increase in group sales to £108.2m. The loss is attributed to factors including “the effect of currency exchange on key commodity prices and poor financial control of central costs”.DecemberRGF announces revenue up 30% year on year to £63.6m in the six months ending 30 September 2017, although it made a £6.7m pre-tax loss compared with a £0.9m loss in the same period the previous year.Shareholders agree to provide an initial £3m of additional funds, while longer-term funding arrangements are put in place.January 2018RGF warns it is set to make £3.5m earnings loss following poor trading at end of 2017MarchMajor shareholders agree to provide up to an additional £4m funding.AprilKent Foods Limited buys Garrett Ingredients business from RGF.MayRGF announces further £8.2m financing from major shareholders Napier Brown Ingredients, Omnicane International Investors, and funds managed by Downing LLP, stating that, without this, there was a “significant risk” it would not be able to trade.JuneRGF announces plan to raise £1m in working capital through open share offer.last_img read more

first_imgShareTweetShareEmail0 SharesJuly 24, 2014; Santa Barbara ViewA nonprofit investigative news site has been closed in Santa Barbara after 13 other local media outlets sent a letter protesting the continuation of the project.Mission & State, an investigative news outlet, was launched less than two years ago with a $1 million grant (to be spent over three years) from the Knight Foundation and, apparently, management oversight of the Santa Barbara Foundation.Last Monday, the foundation’s president, Ron Gallo, emailed a letter to the other media outlets in Santa Barbara County calling it quits. But to be fair, the Foundation had already called it quits, at least as far as its own involvement was concerned, and it was attempting to hand over management of the news site to a for-profit site called Noozhawk. It was this move to which other media outlets objected—loudly enough to spark a public meeting on the proposed merger on July 15th. More than fifty people showed up, and representatives of local media outlets declared their unwillingness to fall in line with the plan, which would have maintained them as “collaborators” with a partner for whom seemingly no trust had been built.In the end, Lois Mitchell of the Orfalea Foundation proposed a reassessment of the plan, but right now, according to Gallo, the Santa Barbara Foundation intends to return the $300,000 that remains from the original $1 million to the Knight Foundation and will settle other obligations.Here is the most interesting excerpt from Gallo’s letter, which basically says that no one is to blame; everything is fine.“Relatively few of the Knight projects created long-term sustainable projects. Out of the 100 grants given, four have been singled out for additional funding by Knight.”Really?We know that foundations are not subject to pay-for-success measurements and the journalism field is in experimentation mode, but this situation is a bit over the top!—Ruth McCambridgeShareTweetShareEmail0 Shareslast_img read more